Prostaglandin Analogues for Alopecia: Considerations for the use of Latanoprost or Bimatoprost
Prostaglandin Analogues for Alopecia: Considerations for the use of
Latanoprost or Bimatoprost
By Sarah Taylor, PharmD
Prostaglandin analogues such as bimatoprost or
latanoprost have historically been used ophthalmically, where they are FDA
approved for the use of elevated intraocular pressure. Bimatoprost 0.03% has
also been approved for the management of hypotrichosis of the eyelashes. The
mechanism of action is prostaglandin analogues interact with prostanoid
receptors in the hair follicle. This is thought to stimulate resting follicles
in the telogen phase and convert them to the anagen phase (associated with hair
growth).3 This same mechanism of action that increases eyelash
growth is thought to be responsible for the growing data to support the use of
prostaglandin analogues topically on the scalp for alopecia.
Data Regarding Alopecia of the
Scalp
Latanoprost has been studied at a very wide range
of concentrations. One double-blind placebo controlled study on topical
application of 0.005% latanoprost over a period of 12 weeks found that the
application of latanoprost significantly increased hair density and regrowth,
though, it didn’t demonstrate significant improvement regarding loss of hair.4
Another double-bind placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of
latanoprost 0.1% for androgenetic alopecia applied daily over 24 weeks. The
study found significantly increased hair density at 24 weeks compared to
placebo.5 Unlike the wide range of studied concentrations with
latanoprost, bimatoprost has primarily been studied at 0.03%. One study
evaluating bimatoprost 0.03% twice daily vs mometasone furoate once daily for
alopecia areata found that bimatoprost significantly improved hair regrowth as
compared to areas where mometasone furoate was applied.6 Another
study evaluated bimatoprost 0.03% vs minoxidil 5% for androgenetic alopecia. This
study was small (with just 8 subjects per group) but it did note significant
increase in terminal hair diameter and count at 12 weeks in the bimatoprost
group. Fewer patients presented with erythema in the bimatoprost group as
compared to the minoxidil group as well.7
Latanoprost vs Bimatoprost:
Efficacy for Alopecia
At this time, there has not been a head-to-head
study of latanoprost vs bimatoprost for alopecia. One study that evaluated
latanoprost 0.005% vs bimatoprost 0.03% once daily for 3 months for the
management of glaucoma and ocular hypertension did note that eyelash hypertrichosis
was noted earlier and more commonly in the bimatoprost group (13%) vs the
latanoprost group (4%).8 Though this was not the primary endpoint of
the study, and therefore must be explored further before anything definitive
can be said, it does offer some potential insight into the differences between
latanoprost and bimatoprost for this condition.
Latanoprost vs Bimatoprost:
Stability
Another place where bimatoprost and latanoprost
differ is thermal stability. The package insert of latanoprost commercially
available ophthalmic product suggests that, once opened the bottle may be
stored at room temperature (up to 25ºC) for up to 6 weeks, suggesting some
thermal stability.1 In comparison, the bimatoprost package insert
specifies that storage may be between 2-25ºC without a specific cap on room
temperature storage.2 In a thermal stability study in which several
prostaglandin analogues were tested at 27, 37, and 50ºC for degradation,
latanoprost was noted to degrade at the 37 and 50ºC conditions whereas
bimatoprost remained stable for the duration of the test even at high
temperatures.8 Latanoprost has noted pH stability between pH 5-7.9
Bimatoprost commercially available eye drops are between pH 6.8-7.8, the range where optimal bimatoprost
stability has been noted.2,10 Further information regarding
latanoprost and bimatoprost stability in more acidic environments was not
available.
Considerations for Choosing
Between Latanoprost or Bimatoprost
Latanoprost and bimatoprost are both prostaglandin
analogues that have been studied for their utility for alopecia, but there are
considerations when working with one or the other for alopecia. Latanoprost has
been studied at a wide array of concentrations for use for alopecia, whereas
bimatoprost has primarily been studied at one. Latanoprost is more susceptible
to degradation at elevated temperature than bimatoprost. Bimatoprost also has
the advantage of being available as a powder rather than a thick viscous liquid
like latanoprost, making it potentially easier to make dilution products with.
Another consideration for choosing between bimatoprost and latanoprost for combination
products is pH stability. Many ingredients for alopecia have optimal stability
at slightly acidic pH, and latanoprost has more demonstrated stability at
acidic pH as compared to bimatoprost for which little data on acidic stability
is available.
Both bimatoprost and latanoprost have been studied
topically for alopecia. The use of one or the other may depend on the
characteristics of the preparation, planned storage of the final dosage form,
and the other active ingredients, if any, present in your preparation. For more
information or further questions regarding bimatoprost and latanoprost and their
utility for alopecia, feel free to reach out to us by heading to www.fagronacademy.us/facts.
Sources:
1.
Latanoprost [package insert]. Tampa, FL:
Bausch and Lomb Incorporated. Revised June 20th 2022.
2.
Bimatoprost [package insert]. Irvine, CA:
Allergan Incorporated. Revised March 8th 2022.
3.
Law SK. Bimatoprost in the treatment of eyelash hypotrichosis.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2010;4:349-358. Published 2010 Apr 26. doi:10.2147/opth.s6480
4.
Rafati M, Mahmoudian R, Golpour M, Kazeminejad A, Saeedi M,
Nakoukar Z. The effect of latanoprost 0.005% solution in the management of
scalp alopecia areata, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Dermatologic
Therapy. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.15450.
5.
Blume-Peytavi U, Lonnfors S, Hillmann K, Garcia Bartels N. A
randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study to assess the efficacy
of a 24-week topical treatment by latanoprost 0.1% on hair growth and
pigmentation in healthy volunteers with androgenetic alopecia. J Am Acad
Dermatol. 2012; 66(5): 794-800.
6.
Zaher H, Gawdat HI, Hegazy RA, Hassan M. Bimatoprost versus
mometasone furoate in the treatment of scalp alopecia areata: A Pilot Study.
Dermatology. 2015;230:308–13.
7.
Tabri, Farida & Anwar, Anis & Adriani, Anni &
Aryaningrum, Dwi. (2018). The Effectiveness of 0.03% Bimatoprost Solution Vs
Minoxidil 5% in Androgenic Alopecia. Indian Journal of Public Health Research
& Development. 9. 1444. 10.5958/0976-5506.2018.02056.9.
8.
Johnson T, Gupta P, Vudathala D, Blair I, Tanna A. Thermal
stability of bimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost under simulated daily
use. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 27(1): 51-59.
9.
Sakai Y, Yasueda S, Ohtori A. Stability of latanoprost in an
ophthalmic lipid emulsion using polyvinyl alcohol. Int J Pharm. 2005;305(1-2):176-179.
doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.08.017
10.
Jansook P, Loftsson T. Aqueous Prostaglandin Eye Drop
Formulations. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(10):2142.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102142
Comments
Post a Comment